S.M.A.R.T.-Analyse Eurer HDs (mittels Speedfan-Tool), Fitness oder Performance unter 75% 0
-
Excelstor (0) 0%
-
Maxtor (0) 0%
-
WD (0) 0%
-
Seagate (0) 0%
-
Samsung (0) 0%
-
IBM/Hitachi (0) 0%
Mit Speedfan ist ja unter anderem auch ein S.M.A.R.T.-Test der installierten HDs möglich, also habe ich meine mal getestet. Die Resultate sind nicht immer gerade rosig, vorallem bei zwei Seagate-HDs, die doch neu sind und wenig gebraucht!
IBM IC35L120AVV207-0, 123.5GB
Die schneidet noch gut ab, obwohl sie schon in die Jahre gekommen ist und viel gelaufen ist.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9, 160GB, SATA
Ein paar Dingchen, die imo nicht so ausschlaggebend sind. Sie ist relativ neu. Win ist drauf installiert.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9, 250 GB
Hier beginnt die Katastrophe! Die Platte ist absolut neu, von Pixmania. Ich habe die ganze Platte 1 x gefüllt mit Moviez und so für ne Auslagerung.
Speedfan gibt verschiedene Punkte an, die nicht in Ordnung sind:
NOTE: not all warnings are reflected on fitness and performance overall values as relevancy is based upon the settings from the hard disk manufacturer who is the best entity deputed to define such relationships.
NOTE : your hard disk has 62 reallocated sectors. Hard disks do have spare sectors (usually from 256 up to 1024) used to replace bad ones. This remapping operation is transparent to the end user. Anyway, this can lead to degradated performances (because remapped sectors are in different places of the disk than the original ones and the head needs additional moving). If reallocated sectors grow over time, you might encounter some serious troubles. A backup of the most important data is suggested anyway.
NOTE : your hard disk has 221 pending sectors (this value is very large and your hard disk should be replaced). Those are sectors that couldn't be properly read and that the hard disk logic is waiting for a write operation to try to remap to a spare sector (if available). According to the Reallocated Sector Count attribute, your hard disk seems to have available spare sectors. A simple disk surface scan won't be enough to force the remap operation. You need a read/write surface scan to remap the sector. The best option should be a tool that knows about what should be read from that sector so that it has some option to apply the best fix to the missing data.
NOTE : your hard disk has 221 offline uncorrectable sectors (this value is very large and your hard disk should be replaced). Those are sectors that an offline scanning found as unreadable. Offline scanning is a process that can be automatically started by the hard disk logic when a long enough idle period is detected or that can be forced by some tool. Those unreadable sectors are identified and the hard disk logic is waiting for a write command that will overwrite them to try to remap them to spare sectors (if available). According to the Reallocated Sector Count attribute, your hard disk seems to have available spare sectors. A simple disk surface scan won't be enough to force the remap operation. You need a read/write surface scan to remap the sector. The best option should be a tool that knows about what should be read from that sector so that it has some option to apply the best fix to the missing data.
The overall fitness for this drive is 51%.
The overall performance for this drive is 69%.
Da S.M.A.R.T. ne recht smarte Sache ist, wenn man denn alles glauben kann, so wäre es doch interessant zu sehen, wie Eure HDs so abschneiden. Am besten Speedfan herunterladen und die HDs testen.
Die angefügte Umfrage soll Aufschluss darüber geben, wie gut verschieden HD-Hersteller abschneiden.
Bitte angeben, welche Marke(n) bei Euch schlecht dastehen. Sagen wir schlecht bedeutet für Werte unter 75 %. Unten steht ja stets ne Prozentzahl für die Fitness und für die Performance. 6 Angaben erlaubt
